Namibia has denied licence applications from Starlink, the satellite internet provider operated by SpaceX, marking another regulatory setback for the company’s expansion in Africa. The rejection covers both a telecommunications service licence and access to radio spectrum, according to a government gazette published on March 23rd.

The notice confirmed the decision but did not include an explanation for why the applications were turned down. Namibia’s regulator, the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia, noted that it retains the authority to revisit the ruling either independently or in response to a petition. Any review must take place within 90 days of the original determination. Officials also indicated that a formal statement providing additional clarity may be released later.

Previous Tensions Over Unlicensed Operations

The latest development follows earlier friction between Starlink and Namibian authorities. In November 2024, the regulator issued a cease-and-desist directive accusing the company of operating in the country without proper authorisation. Consumers were warned against purchasing Starlink hardware, and enforcement officials reportedly confiscated unauthorised terminals.

These disputes highlight the regulatory hurdles Starlink has faced across parts of Africa, where licensing frameworks and state-backed telecom operators often shape market entry.

South Africa Remains a Major Regulatory Roadblock

Starlink’s challenges extend beyond Namibia, with its expansion in South Africa facing prolonged delays. The main obstacle stems from rules set by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa requiring telecom operators to ensure at least 30 percent local ownership by historically disadvantaged South Africans.

SpaceX has resisted this requirement, arguing that its global ownership structure does not allow local equity dilution. Instead, the company has proposed using equity equivalent investment programmes, which would allow it to meet empowerment obligations through investments rather than share transfers.

In late 2025, communications minister Solly Malatsi issued a policy directive asking regulators to consider this alternative. The move sparked political backlash, with some lawmakers accusing the minister of attempting to fast-track Starlink’s entry. Malatsi denied the claim, saying the directive applied broadly and did not favour a specific company.

Regulators acknowledged the directive but maintained that standard processes would still apply, potentially prolonging the review period. Notably, Starlink has not yet submitted a formal licence application in South Africa.


Enforcement Against Grey-Market Usage

As the regulatory standoff continues, South African authorities have stepped up enforcement against unauthorised Starlink usage. Inspection teams have targeted imported terminals and cross-border roaming setups, while officials continue warning the public against using uncertified equipment.

These actions reflect growing efforts to maintain control over telecommunications licensing while the policy debate unfolds.

Competitors Move Into Position

While Starlink navigates regulatory barriers, rival satellite internet initiatives are advancing. Projects such as Project Kuiper, backed by Amazon, are reportedly willing to comply with local ownership rules. This could allow competitors to secure licences sooner, potentially giving them an early advantage in key African markets.

Read More: Airtel Accelerates 5G Expansion Across Nigeria’s Top 20 Cities

Expansion Faces Ongoing Uncertainty

The rejection in Namibia underscores the complex regulatory environment Starlink faces across the continent. Licensing requirements, ownership rules, and enforcement actions continue to shape the company’s rollout strategy.

With no explanation yet for Namibia’s decision and South Africa’s process still unresolved, Starlink’s path into some of Africa’s most significant telecom markets remains uncertain.