CNN Sues Perplexity AI Over Verbatim Copies of Its Articles and Paywalled Content
CNN has filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI in a New York
court, accusing the AI search startup of generating verbatim copies of its
journalism and providing users with content that sits behind CNN's paid
subscription wall. The lawsuit, filed on Thursday, makes CNN the latest in a
growing line of major media organisations taking legal action against
Perplexity over what they describe as systematic unauthorised use of their
content.
What CNN Is Alleging
The lawsuit claims that Perplexity's AI tools reproduce
substantial portions of CNN's reporting without permission or compensation,
using content scraped from CNN's website by crawlers the company says it
repeatedly tried to identify and block. In one specific example cited in the
filing, CNN says that entering the title of one of its articles into
Perplexity's search tool produced significant verbatim portions of the
article's text. The complaint states that human beings report, research, write,
edit, and create the content that Perplexity takes without permission or
compensation.
CNN also alleges that Perplexity gives users access to
content locked behind its subscription paywall, effectively allowing
non-subscribers to access premium journalism they have not paid for by routing
the request through Perplexity's interface. CNN is seeking financial damages
and a permanent injunction against Perplexity's alleged conduct.
The Failed Partnership
The lawsuit follows a breakdown in negotiations between the
two companies. CNN had been in discussions to formally license its content
through Perplexity's Comet Plus subscription service, announced in October
2025. Those talks collapsed in November 2025 after the parties could not agree
on terms, particularly around limits on how Perplexity could use CNN content in
its answers to users. CNN subsequently sent a letter demanding that Perplexity
stop using its content and trademarks without permission. According to the
lawsuit, Perplexity did not respond.
Perplexity spokesperson Jesse Dwyer responded to the lawsuit
with a brief statement: "You cannot copyright facts."
A Growing Legal Problem for Perplexity
CNN joins a significant and expanding list of organisations
suing Perplexity for copyright infringement. The New York Times, Encyclopedia
Britannica, Merriam-Webster, News Corp, Amazon, and Reddit have all filed
separate legal actions against the company. The cumulative weight of these
cases represents a serious legal and reputational challenge for Perplexity as
it attempts to scale its AI search and browser products commercially.
What It Means for AI and Media Globally
The CNN lawsuit is part of a broader reckoning between the
AI industry and the media organisations whose content has been used to train
and power AI products. For Nigerian media companies and journalists, the
outcome of these cases has direct relevance. If courts establish that AI
companies must licence or compensate content creators for the material their
tools reproduce, the precedent would apply globally and could eventually affect
how AI tools interact with African news content in ways that generate compensation
rather than simply consuming it.